ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY

ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY

Authors

  • Alan Robert White Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep - Thailand
  • Tubagus Achmad Darodjat Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep - Thailand
  • Agung Iriantoro Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.237

Keywords:

generative AI, academic writing, business education, ethical awareness, legal writing, undergraduate students, artificial intelligence, student perceptions, AI usage, academic integrity

Abstract

This study examines undergraduate students’ awareness, perceptions, usage patterns, and ethical considerations regarding the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in legal and business writing. A 20-item questionnaire was administered to assess familiarity with AI tools, beliefs about their usefulness, patterns of use in academic contexts, and views on ethical implications. The results indicate moderate awareness and generally positive perceptions of generative AI, particularly in terms of improving writing quality and clarifying complex concepts. However, actual usage remains limited, and many students report a lack of formal instruction or clear guidelines on ethical use. Notably, students expressed strong support for institutional guidance and recognised the importance of responsible AI integration in academic settings. The findings underscore the need for targeted educational interventions and policy development to align student behaviour with ethical academic standards. Recommendations are made for integrating AI training into business education and conducting further research on the long-term academic effects of generative AI use.

References

Adedoyin, A., & Oluwafemi, A. Ethical and Legal Considerations for Generative AI Tools. Research Gate.

Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(supplement 1), 106–124.

Cyphert, A. B. (2023). Generative AI, plagiarism, and copyright infringement in legal documents. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 25, 49.

Davenport, M. J. (2025). Enhancing legal document analysis with large language models: A structured approach to accuracy, context preservation, and risk mitigation. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 15(2), 232–280.

Delgado, V. R., Sales, K. F., & de Abreu, V. A. C. (2024, July). Ethical reflections on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the academic sphere: writing and authorship. In Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade (WICS) (pp. 153-160). SBC.

Gouri, H., Jindal, P., Gouri, R., & Gouri, V. (2025). AI-generated legal documents: Challenges and opportunities for corporate law firms. Exploration of AI in Contemporary Legal Systems, 73–84.

Harasta, J., Novotná, T., & Savelka, J. (2024). It cannot be right if it was written by AI: On lawyers’ preferences of documents perceived as authored by an LLM vs a human. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1–38.

Hein, K., Nahra, K. J., & Cangarlu, R. (2025). The Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence/Generative AI on the Practice of Law in 2025.

Jacinto Matos, E., Correa Bertoncini, A. L., Figueiredo Dalla Costa Ames, M. C., & Custódio Serafim, M. (2024). The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in Business Management education and research. RAM. Mackenzie Management Review/RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 25(6).

Joshi, S. (2025). Generative AI in Legal Practice: Applications, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations. Legal Practice: Applications, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations (June 04, 2025).

Mika, K. (2022). Friend or foe? Lexis artificial intelligence (AI) in legal writing. Proceedings: Online Journal of Legal Writing Presentations, 3(1), 24.

Pham, T. T. D., & Luong, M. H. (2025). Students’ challenges in employing AI tools in legal writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(2), 75–86.

Regalia, J. (2024). From briefs to bytes: How generative AI is transforming legal writing and practice. Tulsa Law Review, 59, 193.

Smith, M. L. (2023). Language models, plagiarism, and legal writing. University of New Hampshire Law Review, 22, 361.

Published

2025-09-15

How to Cite

White, A. R., Darodjat, T. A. ., & Iriantoro, A. . (2025). ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY: ETHICAL AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC USE OF AI IN LEGAL AND BUSINESS WRITING AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AT A THAI PUBLIC UNIVERSITY. PENA LAW: International Journal of Law, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v3i2.237

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)