THE EFFECT OF IPAK, REGIONAL GDP PER CAPITA, UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX ON THE TAX RATIO IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2020–2024 PERIOD

THE EFFECT OF IPAK, REGIONAL GDP PER CAPITA, UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX ON THE TAX RATIO IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2020–2024 PERIOD

Authors

  • Florida Salvi Aso Undergraduate Applied Study Programme in Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
  • Sri Yani Kusumastuti Undergraduate Applied Study Programme in Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56107/penanomics.v5i2.323

Keywords:

Tax Ratio, Anti-Corruption Behavior Index (IPAK), GRDP Per Capita, Unemployment Rate, Human Development Index (HDI)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of the Anti-Corruption Behavior Index (IPAK), Regional Gross Domestic Product (GRDP) per capita, unemployment rate, and Human Development Index (HDI) on the tax ratio across 34 provinces in Indonesia over the period 2020–2024. The tax ratio is a key fiscal performance indicator; however, Indonesia’s tax ratio remains relatively low compared to its economic potential and the regional average of Asia-Pacific countries.This study employs a quantitative approach using panel data comprising 34 provinces over 5 observation years (2020–2024), yielding a total of 170 observations. The analysis utilizes panel data regression with the Fixed Effect Model (FEM), selected based on the results of the Chow Test and Hausman Test. Data were obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS), the Ministry of Finance, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).The results indicate that, partially, the unemployment rate has a significant negative effect on the tax ratio, meaning that higher unemployment leads to lower tax revenue. Meanwhile, IPAK and GRDP per capita have a positive but insignificant effect on the tax ratio, while HDI has a negative but insignificant effect. Simultaneously, all four variables jointly exert a significant influence on the tax ratio in Indonesia. An Adjusted R-Squared value of 0.7313 indicates that 73.13% of the variation in the tax ratio is explained by the four variables in the model.This study recommends that the government focus on creating quality employment in the formal sector, improving the effectiveness of tax administration, broadening the tax base, and enhancing human resource quality through education, healthcare, and economic empowerment programs, in order to sustainably improve the tax ratio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BPS. (2024). Indeks Perilaku Anti Korupsi. Berita Resmi Statistik.

BPS. (2024). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Fitriani, A., Prasetiyaningsih, E., Ameliyaningsih, T., Wahono, P., & Pahala, I. (2024). Overview Indonesia Tax Ratio in According to Political Agenda and Comparison with Another Country. Moneter: Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 12(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.32832/moneter.v12i2.762

Khotimah, & Tsani, L. I. (2025). Determinan Rasio Pajak di Indonesia: Studi Pada Tahun 1992-2023. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Ekonomi, 5, 20–35.

Minh Ha, N., Tan Minh, P., & Binh, Q. M. Q. (2022). The determinants of tax revenue: A study of Southeast Asia. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2026660

OECD. (2022). Moral Perpajakan II: Membangun Kepercayaan antara Administrasi Perpajakan dan Perusahaan Besar. In Laporan Kinerja 2024 Direktorat Promosi Kesehatan. Penerbit OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/7587f25c-en

Pramudita, V. R., & Binekas, B. (2025). The Effect Of Income Per Capita, Economic Growth Rate, And Tax Rate On Tax Ratio In Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Countries In 2016-2022. 8(3).

Putri, A. A. R., & Ribawati, E. (2025). Analisis Pengaruh Pajak Daerah , Belanja Bantuan Sosial, dan Tingkat Kemiskinan Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Indonesia Tahun 2020 - 2024. 4(3), 25–48.

Putriana, R. (2022). Pengaruh Inklusi Keuangan Terhadap Rasio Pajak Di Negara Berpendapatan Rendah Dan Menengah. Scientax, 3(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.52869/st.v3i2.211

Rakhadita, A. C., & Prabowo, P. . (2022). Pengaruh Tenaga Kerja dan Investasi Terhadap PDRB Subsektor Ekonomi Kreatif Kota Surabaya. Jae (Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi), 7(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v7i1.17697

Santosa, A., Rahman, A., Fadillah, S., & Fadilla, S. (2025). The Power of Tax Knowledge: Key Factors to Boost Tax Compliance. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 21(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v21i2.1635

Sari, R. A., & Rochmatullah, M. R. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Penerimaan Pajak Daerah Dan Retribusi Daerah Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Kabupaten Dan Kota Provinsi Jawa Tengah ( Periode Tahun 2017-. 4(5), 5983–5994.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2021). Economic Development (berilustra). Erlangga.

Zuhrah, N., Umamah, R., Kurniawan, H., & Nurcahya, W. F. (2024). Pengaruh Reformasi dan Modernisasi Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan dan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia. Journal of Macroeconomics and Social Development, 1(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.47134/jmsd.v1i4.365

Downloads

Published

2026-08-02

How to Cite

Aso, F. S., & Kusumastuti, S. Y. . (2026). THE EFFECT OF IPAK, REGIONAL GDP PER CAPITA, UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX ON THE TAX RATIO IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2020–2024 PERIOD: THE EFFECT OF IPAK, REGIONAL GDP PER CAPITA, UNEMPLOYMENT RATE, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX ON THE TAX RATIO IN INDONESIA FOR THE 2020–2024 PERIOD. PENANOMICS: International Journal of Economics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56107/penanomics.v5i2.323

Issue

Section

Articles