Legislation and the Constitutional Court: Reconciling Constitutional Justice and Democratic Accountability in Comparative Constitutional Law: Legislation and the Constitutional Court: Reconciling Constitutional Justice and Democratic Accountability in Comparative Constitutional Law

Muhammad Rum Siolimbona; Hedwig Adianto  Mau; Sineenart  Suasoongnern

doi:10.56107/penalaw.v4i1.294

Authors

Muhammad Rum Siolimbona Doctor of Law Studies Program, Postgraduate Program - Jayabaya University, Indonesia
Hedwig Adianto Mau Doctor of Law Studies Program, Postgraduate Program - Jayabaya University, Indonesia
Sineenart Suasoongnern Rajamangala University Of Technology Krungthep, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v4i1.294

Keywords:

Constitutional Justice; Democratic Accountability; Legislation; Constitutional Courts; Judicial Review; Comparative Constitutional Law

Abstract

The dynamic relationship between legislation and constitutional courts has become a key issue in modern constitutional law. Legislation, reflecting democratic legitimacy, often faces challenges when political majorities pass laws that may threaten constitutional rights and the rule of law principles. Conversely, constitutional courts act as guardians of constitutional supremacy, ensuring that laws align with fundamental constitutional values. This study uses a normative juridical and comparative approach, analyzing constitutional texts, legislation, and landmark judicial decisions from Indonesia, Germany, South Africa, and South Korea. Through content analysis, comparative legal methods, and hermeneutic interpretation, the research shows that constitutional courts worldwide do not just correct unconstitutional laws but also play a constructive role in fostering democratic accountability. The findings emphasize that the relationship between legislation and constitutional courts should not be seen as adversarial; rather, it is a dialectical and symbiotic interaction that promotes constitutional democracy. The novelty of this research lies in its global comparative perspective, moving beyond country-specific analyses and suggesting a conceptual framework for understanding how legislative legitimacy and constitutional justice reinforce each other. This study contributes both to theoretical debates in comparative constitutional law and offers practical recommendations for improving judicial review and legislative processes in democratic systems.

References

Barber, N. W., & Vermeule, A. (2017). The exceptional role of courts in the constitutional order. Notre Dame Law Review, 92(2), 817–858. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2734218

Barclay, S. H. (2025). Constructing Constitutional Rights. Harvard Law Review, 138, 140. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5272478

Bin-Armia, M. S., Armia, M. S., Rifqy, F. F., Tengku-Armia, H., & Mustika, C. R. (2024). From Constitutional-Court To Court of Cartel: a Comparative Study of Indonesia and Other Countries. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 9(2), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.437

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Cohen, E. (2021). The Jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court. Constitutional Court Review, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.2989/ccr.2021.0016

Cohen, J., & Charles, S. (1997). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), 313–342.

Crouch, M. (2024). The Rise and Decline of Constitutionalism in the Global South: The Case of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. Verfassung Und Recht in Ubersee, 57(1), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2024-1-147

Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123411

Fallon, R. H. (2008). The core of an uneasy case for judicial review. Harvard Law Review, 121(7), 1693–1736. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108673549.008

Faulkner, R. A. (2024). In Search of Constitutional Stability : Comparative Alternatives to Substantive Due Process. Tex. L. Rev., 103, 635.

Fernando, H., Larasati, Y. G., Abdullah, I., Ismail, Yunani, A., Nastain, M., & Morin, L. (2024). the Controversy of Indonesian Democracy Practices in the Post-Reform. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1594

Gerber, S. D. (2008). The Court, the Constitution, and the History of Ideas. Vanderbilt Law Review, 61, 1067. http://proxy2.hec.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/198982106?accountid=11357%5Cnhttp://gutenberg.hec.ca:3210/sfxlcl3?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:abiglobal&atitle=The+Court,+the+Cons

Gould, J. S. (2021). The Law of Legislative Representation. Virginia Law Review, 107(4), 765–843.

Greene, J. (2018). Foreword: Rights as trumps? Harvard Law Review, 132(1), 28.

I Made Sila, I Gusti Ngurah Santika, Daniel Ndara Kandi, & Carolina R. K. D Ngana. (2025). Democracy and the 1945 Constitution: a Political Perspective on Indonesia’S Constitutional Framework. International Journal of Education and Social Science Studies, 1(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.60153/ijesss.v1i2.200

Landaut, D., & Dixon, R. (2020). Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy. Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy, 53(3), 1313. https://heinonline.org/HOL/License

Mietzner, M. (2010). Political conflict resolution and democratic consolidation in Indonesia: The role of the constitutional court. Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(3), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800003672

Nurhayati, Y., Zahir, M. Z. M., Ifrani, & Komarudin, P. (2022). Investment in Indonesia After Constitutional Court’s Decision in the Review of Job Creation Law. Lentera Hukum, 9(3), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i3.32368

Oquendo, Á. R. (2002). Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(2), 189–226. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298790

Paris, D. (2017). Constitutional courts as European union courts: The current and potential use of EU law as a yardstick for constitutional review. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(6), 792–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17747232

Parkinson, J. (2003). Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00419

Popelier, P., Glavina, M., Baldan, F., & van Zimmeren, E. (2022). A research agenda for trust and distrust in a multilevel judicial system. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X221096026

Pujayanti, L. P. V. A., Nugrahayu, Z. Z., Rahim, E. I., Muhtar, M. H., & Yassine, C. (2024). Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: Bastion of Law Enforcement and Protector of Human Rights in The Reform Era. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 17(1), 35–49. https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/pamator/article/view/24128

Rahmah, C. D. (2025). Reforming Ethical Oversight Mechanisms for Constitutional Court Justices in Indonesia. Legal Horizons, 25(25), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.54477/10.54477/lh.25192353.2025.2.pp.86-96

Rahman, A., & Maizaroh, M. (2024). Strengthening Independence: Constitutional Interests As A Paradigm For Judicial Review In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 13(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.33-62

Reinstein, R. J., & Rahdert, M. C. (2004). Reconstructing Marbury. Ark. L. Rev, 57, 729.

Roux, T. (2009). Principle and pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(1), 106–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon029

Sebastian, L. C., Chen, J., & Priamarizki, A. (2014). Indonesia beyond reformasi: Necessity and the “de-centering” of democracy. Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 3(1), 1. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mscas/vol2014/iss3/1/%0Ahttps://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=mscas

Shahramnia, a M. (2011). Explanation of deliberative democracy in philosophical thoughts of Jurgen Habermas. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 5(5), 254–261.

Tuomala, J. C. (2015). Marbury v. Madison and the Foundation of Law. Liberty University Law Review, 4(2), 3.

Vanberg, G. (2015). Constitutional courts in comparative perspective: A theoretical assessment. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161150

Vitale, D. (2006). Between deliberative and participatory democracy: A contribution on Habermas. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 32(6), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706064022

Waldron, J. (1993). A right-based critique of constitutional rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 18–51.

Yeh, J., & Chang, W. (2025). Changing Dynamics of Constitutional Progress and Regression in Asia : Interplay of Electoral , Civic , and Judicial Constitutionalism. Constitutional Studies, 11(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15781/w6xr2h18

Zurn, C. F. (2002). Deliberative democracy and constitutional review. Law and Philosophy, 21(4), 467–542.

Legislation and the Constitutional Court: Reconciling Constitutional Justice and Democratic Accountability in Comparative Constitutional Law