Digital Constitutionalism and Human Rights: A Comparative Constitutional Response to Global Technological Challenges: Digital Constitutionalism and Human Rights: A Comparative Constitutional Response to Global Technological Challenges

Ardhy Gumilar; Abdul  Latif; Supaphorn  Akkapin

doi:10.56107/penalaw.v4i1.300

Authors

Ardhy Gumilar Doctor of Law Studies Program, Postgraduate Program - Jayabaya University, Indonesia
Abdul Latif Doctor of Law Studies Program, Postgraduate Program - Jayabaya University, Indonesia
Supaphorn Akkapin Rajamangala University Of Technology Krungthep, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v4i1.300

Keywords:

Digital Constitutionalism; Human Rights; Privacy; Freedom Of Expression; State Surveillance; Comparative Constitutional Law; Indonesia

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital technologies has reshaped communication, governance, and the interpretation of constitutional rights. This study examines how constitutionalism, traditionally designed to limit state power, must adapt to new digital challenges such as surveillance, data exploitation, algorithmic governance, and restrictions on online expression. Using a normative-comparative approach, this study examines constitutional texts, landmark decisions, and regulatory frameworks from Germany, India, South Africa, and Indonesia, alongside international instruments such as the ICCPR and the GDPR. Findings highlight three main patterns. First, privacy and data protection are increasingly recognized as constitutional rights, although this recognition is inconsistent across jurisdictions. Second, digital freedom of expression remains a contested issue, with some courts applying proportionality while others rely on administrative controls. Third, responses to state surveillance reveal a global trend toward stronger safeguards; yet, significant gaps persist in developing contexts, such as Indonesia. This article advances the concept of digital constitutionalism as a paradigm shift extending constitutional protections beyond the state to powerful technology corporations. Theoretically, it reframes constitutionalism in the digital era; practically, it offers normative guidance for courts and policymakers to reinforce digital rights. Ultimately, digital constitutionalism is vital not only for protecting individual rights but also for sustaining democracy in the digital age.

References

Ahmad, N., Ali, A. W., & Yussof, M. H. B. bin. (2025). The Challenges of Human Rights in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.1.9

Alvina, H., Julianti, L., Sugiantari, A. A. P. W., & Udytama, I. W. W. W. (2022). The State of Digital Freedom in Indonesia an Assessment of Online Censorship, Privacy, and Free Expression. Journal of Digital Law and Policy, 1(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.58982/jdlp.v1i3.301

Arifin, F. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Indonesian Democracy: A Perspective on the Sovereignty of Law and the Distribution of Power. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.353

Arifin, F. (2024). Position and Authority of the Constitutional Court as a Guardian of the Constitution. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1658–1665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.630

Astariyani, N. L. G., Hermanto, B., da Cruz, R., & Wisnaeni, F. (2023). Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia. Law Reform, 19(2), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.55819

Aziz, N. binti A., & Ristawati, R. (2020). The Constitutional Power Of The Executive in The Age of Rule of Law: A Comparative Study on Malaysia and Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 3(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.3.2.1857.75-83

Baer, S. (2009). Dignity, liberty, equality: A fundamental rights triangle of constitutionalism. University of Toronto Law Journal, 59(4), 417–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.59.4.417

Balkin, J. (2008). The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age. Pepp. L. Rev., 36(2), 101–118. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/pepplr36&section=18

Bhuta, N. (2025). Social rights and the origins of the social constitution: From collective natural rights to the social state. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 23(1), 11–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaf015 Link:

Bleshchik, A. V., Kalinina, E. G., & Nesmeyanova, S. E. (2021). Transformation of constitutional identity due to contemporary challenges. Law Enforcement Review, 5(3), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(3).87-100

Bradford, A. (2023). Europe ’ s Digital Constitution. Va. J. Int’l L, 64, 1.

Breyer, S. (2002). Our democratic constitution. New York Law Rev, 77(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071800942.n29

Caruso, C. (2025). Towards the Institutions of Freedom: The European Public Discourse in the Digital Era. German Law Journal, 26(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.68

Celeste, E. (2019). Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 33(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1562604

Celeste, E., & Formici, G. (2024). Constitutionalizing Mass Surveillance in the EU: Civil Society Demands, Judicial Activism, and Legislative Inertia. German Law Journal, 25(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.105

Charamba, K. (2022). Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect in the Dawn of a Metaverse. U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4043254

Custers, B. (2022). New digital rights: Imagining additional fundamental rights for the digital era. Computer Law and Security Review, 44, 105636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105636

De Gregorio, G., & Radu, R. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in the new era of Internet governance. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaac004

DoCarmo, T., Rea, S., Conaway, E., Emery, J., & Raval, N. (2021). The law in computation: What machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big data mean for law and society scholarship. Law and Policy, 43(2), 170–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12164

Eberle, E. J. (2001). The Right to Information Self-Determination. Utah Law Review, 4(3).

Eberle, E. J. (2012). Observations on the Development of Human Dignity and Personality in German Constitutional Law: An Overview. Liverpool Law Review, 33(3), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-012-9120-x

Eddyono, L. W. (2017). Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Norms and Practices. Constitutional Review, 3(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev314

Ferrajoli, L. (2001). Fundamental Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 14, 1–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011290509568

Ferrarese, M. R. (2009). When national actors become transnational: Transjudicial dalogue between democracy and constitutionalism. Global Jurist, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1934-2640.1305

Ghofur, N. (2024). Law, Media, and Democracy in the Digital Era: Freedom of Expression and ITE Regulation in Indonesia. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 12(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v12i2.3703

Haber, E., & Zarsky, T. (2017). Cybersecurity for Infrastructure: A Critical Analysis Cybersecurity for Infrastructure: A Critical Analysis Recommended Citation Recommended Citation CYBERSECURITY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS. U. L. Rev, 44(2), 515. https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol44/iss2/3

Hanafi. (2025). The Dialectics of Freedom of Expression and Legal Restrictions on Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Human Rights Principles, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 5(1), 57–75.

Helm, R. K., & Nasu, H. (2021). Regulatory Responses to “Fake News” and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation. Human Rights Law Review, 21(2), 302–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa060

Hirschl, R. (2018). Judicial review and the politics of comparative citations: Theory, evidence and methodological challenges. Comparative Judicial Review, 403–422. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110600.00029

Irawan, B. B., Febriharini, M. P., Sukmariningsih, R. M., & Riyanto, O. S. (2024). The Authority of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: A Comprehensive Analysis of Its Role in Settling Disputes Among State Institution. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2), 20972–20986. https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.2.000194

Karabacak, B., Ozkan Yildirim, S., & Baykal, N. (2016). Regulatory approaches for cyber security of critical infrastructures: The case of Turkey. Computer Law and Security Review, 32(3), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.02.005

Kaur, D. (2024). A Comparative Study of the Evaluation on the Right to Privacy in India and the UK, Their Legal Frameworks and Judicial Interpretation: A Cyber Law Perspective. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, 6(4), 600–628. https://www.ijlsi.com/UndertheaegisofVidhiAagaz-InkingYourBrain%0Ahttps://www.vidhiaagaz.com

Kosseff, J. (2017). Defining cybersecurity law. Iowa Law Review, 103(3), 985–1031.

Land, M. K., & Aronson, J. D. (2020). Human rights and technology: New challenges for justice and accountability. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-060220-081955

Latif, A., Sangga, A., Thahir, Suaib, & Jalil. (2024). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Realizing Dignified Justice: A Constitutional Law Perspective. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 13–30.

Legg, S., Ehrkamp, P., Crampton, J. W., Belina, B., Smith, N., & Hannah, M. G. (2012). Reading Matthew G. Hannah’s Dark Territory in the Information Age: Learning from the West German Census Controversies of the 1980s. Political Geography, 31(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.01.002

Lenaerts, K. (2021). The Rise of Digital Constitutionalism in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1), 41–70.

Liu, H. W., Lin, C. F., & Chen, Y. J. (2019). Beyond state v loomis: Artificial intelligence, government algorithmization and accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 27(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaz001

Loughlin, M. (2015). The constitutional imagination. Modern Law Review, 78(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12104

Mantelero, A., Vaciago, G., Samantha Esposito, M., & Monte, N. (2020). The common EU approach to personal data and cybersecurity regulation. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(4), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa021

Marune, A. E. M. S., & Hartanto, B. (2021). Strengthening Personal Data Protection, Cyber Security, and Improving Public Awareness in Indonesia: Progressive Legal Perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 2(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.170

McGregor, L., Murray, D., & Ng, V. (2019). International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2), 309–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000046

Mendy, O., & Sarr, E. (2025). The Judiciary in Governance: Understanding the Juridical Nature and Function of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i1.45

Michaels, J. D. (2015). An enduring, evolving separation of Powers. Columbia Law Review, 115(3), 515–598.

Michelman, F. I. (2003). The Constitution, Social Rights and Liberal Political Justification. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.1.13

Misbahul Mujib, M., & Muchlas, M. K. (2023). Achievements and Challenges of Human Rights Protection Policy in Realizing Good Governance in Indonesia and China. In Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System (Vol. 3, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.98

Moh. Thohir, & Didik Sukriono. (2024). Implementation Authority of the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian Constitutional Law System. Awang Long Law Review, 6(2), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v6i2.1112

Müller, S. (2024). Cybersecurity and Its Implications for Freedom of Expression in Germany’s Digital Media Landscape. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 3(1), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.56397/jlcs.2024.03.19

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855

Prasetianingsih, R. (2020). Judicial Activism in Indonesia: Constitutional Culture By the Constitutional Court. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 5(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.106 JUDICIAL

Prasetyo, B., Handayani, I. G. A. K. H., & Sulistiyono, A. (2025). Data Protection Laws in Indonesia-Navigating Privacy in the Digital Age. SIDE: Scientifict Development Journal, 2(1), 9–16. https://ojs.arbain.co.id/index.php/side/article/view/115/96

Rochefort, A. (2020). Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis. Communication Law and Policy, 25(2), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194

Schwöbel, C. E. J. (2010). Situating the debate on global constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(3), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq021

Setyawan, D., Suganda, A., & Akkapin, S. (2024). The Role of The Constitutional Court in Maintaining the Balance of Power in Indonesia. LAW & PASS: International Journal of Law, Public Administration and Social Studies, 1(4), 415–424. https://lawpass.org/index.php/ojs/article/view/40

Sumartono, E., Harliyanto, R., Situmeang, S. M. T., Siagian, D. S., & Septaria, E. (2024). The Legal Implications of Data Privacy Laws, Cybersecurity Regulations, and AI Ethics in a Digital Society. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.59613/29qypw51

Surono, D. R., & Widjaja, G. (2025). The Role Of Judicial Review In The Indonesian Legal System : A Literature Review On Constitutional Protection And Legal Accountability. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (INJOSS), 4(3), 611–622.

Teubner, G. (2015). Horizontal Effects of Constitutional Rights in the Internet: A Legal Case on the Digital Constitution. The Italian Law Journal, 3(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.23815/2421-2156.ITALJ

Teubner, G., & Golia, A. (2023). Societal Constitutionalism in the Digital World: An Introduction. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 30(2), 1–23.

Tommi Imanuel, W., & Fauzan, I. (2023). Analysis of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age in the Issue of Electronic Information and Transaction Law in Indonesia. Perspektif, 12(4), 1117–1126. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i4.9875

Wylde, V., Rawindaran, N., Lawrence, J., Balasubramanian, R., Prakash, E., Jayal, A., Khan, I., Hewage, C., & Platts, J. (2022). Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and Blockchain: A Review. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01020-4

Yilma, K. M. (2017). Digital privacy and virtues of multilateral digital constitutionalism-Preliminary thoughts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 25(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eax001

Young, E. A. (2007). The constitution outside the constitution. Yale Law Journal, 117(3), 408–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/20455798

Digital Constitutionalism and Human Rights: A Comparative Constitutional Response to Global Technological Challenges