HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNANCE ANALYSIS (EMPIRICAL STUDY ON MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY IN JAKARTA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56107/penanomics.v2i1.96Keywords:
Agency theory, Institutional theory, The control mechanism, IsomorphismAbstract
Functioning of the role of group manager in the management of the organization can improve productivity. However, the function is also a phenomenon in the relationship between principals and agents, where there is a divergence of interests between owners and managers of organizations who then create the agency problem, because basically the agent has their own interests. This is where the role of control is needed to suppress agency problems. Departure from this idea, the research aim is to understand the mechanisms of control and rational behavior of agents in the practices of elections, financial reporting, and compensation. The study concludes: 1) the norms and cultural values appear to be more prominent than economic value in the control mechanism. Norms and values restrict the organization's behavior and justify the sanction for any inappropriate behavior in the system. Lack of commitment and socialization occur relatively high on the system of organization members who continually give up some or all personal interests to become a member of Muhammadiyah; 2) the rationality that is developed within the organization is a form of mental construction agent based on social experience, character local and specification. Muhammadiyah values tradition that was developed by Ahmad Dahlan have become the source of agent, especially in the rationalization measures gain legitimacy from the environment.
Downloads
References
AICPA. (1973). Codification of auditing standars and procedures. York
Akdere, Mesut and A. Ross E. (2006). Agency theory implication for efficient contract in organization development. Organization Development Journal. Summer.
Anand, Sanjay. (2008). Essential of corporate governance. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons Inc.
Arrow, K.J. (1985). The economic of agency in principles and agents: the structure of American Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Barkema, H. and L. Gόmez-Mejia. Managerial compensation and firm performance: a general research framework. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 41.
Berger and Luckmann. (1971). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Book Ltd.
Bertens, K. (2000). Pengantar etika bisnis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Blumer, Herbert. (1992). Symbolic Interaction. Dalam J.P. Spadley. Cultural and Cognition. San Fransisco: Chandler Publisihing Company.
Bonazzi, Livia and Sardar M.N. Islam. “Agency Theory and Corporate Governance: a Study of the Effectiveness of Baord in this Monitoring of CEO.” Center for Strategic Economic Studies. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Tecnology.
Brennan. (1995). Corporate Finance over the Past 25 Year. Financial Management.
Caiden, Gerald. (1969). Administrative reform. Illinois: Aldine Publishing Company.
Cameron, K.S. and D.A. Whetten. (1981). Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 26.
Carr, J.B. and R.S. Brower. (1996). Principal-Agent as an Explanation of Unsanctioned Managerial Behavior: Is the Theory Useful?. A paper for the 1996 Academy of Management Meeting.
Chesmore, Marshal C. (2002). The Effect of Institutional Preseures on Environmental Interconectedness–A Social Network Analysis Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, Benedictine University.
Coffey, Amanda et al. (1999). Qualitative data analysis: technologies and representation. Dalam Alan Bryman and Robert G. Burgess, eds., Qualitative Research Vol. III London: Sage Publications,
Conger, Jay A.; David Finegold and Edward E. Lawlwer. (2000). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review on Corporate Governance
Core, John E. et al. (2003). Executive equity compensation and incentive survey. Economic Policy Review. New York, Vol. 9 (1), April.
Danutirto, Haryanto. (2008). Memantapkan Kapasitas Institusi dan Memberdayakan ITB untuk Pembangunan Bangsa. Pidato Ketua MWA pada Dies Natalis ITB. Bandung, 2 Maret.
Denzim, N.K. (1978). The Logic of Naturalistic Inquiry. Dalam N.K. Denzim, (ed.), Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. New York: McGraww-Hill.
Desai, Asahay Bhalchandra. (1998). A study of the relationship between changes in the corporate governance mechanism: CEO turnover and performance in declining firms. Dessertation, Doctor of Philosophy Degree, Memphis University.
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorpishm and colecctive rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. Vol. 48
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Dalam J. Meyer and R. Scott (eds.). Organizational Environments. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Dorege, Scott B.; and Shane Spiller. (2009). Critique of a premise: illuminating cracks in the agency theory framework. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, Vol. 12 (1)
Drucker, Peter F. (2006). Classic drucker. Boston: Harvard Businness School Publishing Corp.
Drumm, Kathy H. (2000). Institutional theory for performance based funding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Nova Southern University
Eisenhardt, Katleen M. (1985). Control: organizational and economic approaches. Management Science. Vol. 31.
Eisenhardt, Katleen M. (1988). Agency and institutional theory explanations: the case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal Review. Vol. 14 (1).
Eisenhardt, Katleen M. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review. 14 (1).
Eva C., Chu. (1988). Dominant coalition as a mediating mechanism between the rational model and the political model in organization theory. Paper in Academy of Management Conference. California: Anaheim, August.
Etzioni, Amitai. (1965). Organizational control structure. Dalam J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organization. III. Chicago: Rand McNally
Fernandez-Alles, Mariluz et al. (2006). How symbolic remuneration contributes to the legitimacy of the company: an institutional explanation. Human Relations. Vol. 59 (7), Jul.
Frederickson, H. George. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. NY: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Gomez-Mejia, L.R. and R.M. Wiseman. (1997). Reframing executive compensation: and assessment and outlook. Journal of Management, Vol. 23 (3).
Halacmi, Arie. (1997). Agency theory and transaction analisyis in the incresingly competitive public sector. Dalam Lev I. Jakobson. Innovation and inertia in public administration under reform: the case of Rusia. Moscow: National Conference of The American Society for Public Administration Philadelphia, PA
Halacmi, Arie. (1997). Franchising in government: can principal-agent perspective be the first step toward the development of theory?. Dalam Lev I. Jakobson. Innovation and inertia in public administration under reform: the case of Rusia. Moscow: National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration Philadelphia, PA,
Hatch, Mary Jo. (1997). Organization theory: modern symbolic and postmodern perspective. New York: Oxford University Press
Hart, Oliver. (1990). An economist’s perspective on the theory of the Firm, dalam Oliver E. William (ed.), Organization theory: from chesters Bernard to the present and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hitt, Michael, A.R. Duane Ireland, and Robert E. Hoskison. (1995). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization. St. Paul: West Publishing Company
Irawan, Prasetya. (2006). Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif untuk ilmu-ilmu sosial. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP–UI.
Jean and Pascal. (1997). Contractual relationship within the Firm. Dalam Claude Menard (ed.) Transaction cost economic: recent development. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic
Jones, Gareth R. (1993). Organizationa theory. NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
Kearns, Kevin. (1996). Managing for accountability: preserving the public trust in public and non-profit organizations. San Francisco: Josey Bass Publisher
Killick, T. (1997). Principals, agents and the failings of conditionality. Journal of International Development
Khomsiyah dan Deni. Hubungan corporate governance dan kinerja perusahaan. The Indonesia Institute for Corporate Governance (IICG).
Lee, Dalton S. and Susan C. Paddock. (1992). Improving the effectiveness of theaching public administration ethics. Public Productivity and Management Review 15, No. 4.
Loughry, Misty L. and Heater Elms. (2006). An agency theory investigation of medical constructures versus member physicians. Jounal of Managerial Issues. Vol. XVIII. No. 4. Winter. 547-569.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew McCubbins. (2000). Representation or abdication? how citizens use institututions to help delegeation succeed. European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 37
Makmur. (2007). Patologi serta terapinya dalam ilmu administrasi dan organisasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama
March, James G. and Herbert A Simon. (1958). Organization. New York: John Willey
Mayrhofer, Wolfgang. “Between Market, Bureaucracy, and Clan Coordination and Control Mechanism in the Cranfield Network on European Human Resource Management (Cranet-E).” Journal of Management Psychology, Vol. 13, 1998.
Meyer, J. and B. Rowan. “ Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 (2), 1977.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Pablications, 1984).
OTHER SOURCES
Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. Pedoman Hidup Islami Warga Muhammadiyah (Keputusan Muktamar Muhammadiyah Ke – 44 Tanggal 8 – 11 Juli 2000 di Jakarta ).
Qaidah Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah BAB VI, pasal 10. “Reorientasi Sekolah Kader.” Majalah Suara Muhammadiyah, No 03/Th. ke- 91/1-15 Februari 2008.
“Profil Muhammadiyah: Program-Program Muhammadiyah.” Penerbit Suara Muhammadiyah, 2000, hal. 100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Haris Sarwoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
